Quand les destins d'une prophètesse malhonnète et d'un prince romantique se rencontrent... Un conte de fée sombre et moderne. Violet est une prophétesse et une menteuse.
Voilà des années qu'elle influence la cour grâce à ses prophéties habilement tournées - à défaut d'être toujours vraies.
Mais le prince Cyrus est bien décidé à la destituer, aussitôt qu'il sera couronné, et Violet le sait pertinemment...
Seulement Cyrus est maudit et le royaume court à sa perte. Violet devra user de son intelligence pour sauver le monde de la destruction... tout en luttant contre l'attraction irrésistible qui grandit entre elle et le prince.
This book explores the way today's interconnected and digitized world--marked by social media, over-sharing, and blurred lines between public and private spheres--shapes the nature and fallout of scandal in a frenzied media environment. Today's digitized world has erased the former distinction between the public and private self in the social sphere. Scandal in a Digital Age marries scholarly research on scandal with journalistic critique to explore how our Internet culture driven by (over)sharing and viral, visual content impacts the occurrence of scandal and its rapid spread online through retweets and reposts. No longer are examples of scandalous behavior "merely" reported in the news. Today, news consumers can see the visual evidence of salacious behavior whether through an illicit tweet or video with a simple click. And we can't help but click.
This book investigates what influence online incivility-through user-generated comments on news websites-has on public debate. Built on the premise that public discussions about important topics are vital to a healthy democracy, the book analyzes 3,508 online comments in order to understand what factors in comments make them more susceptible to incivility, defined as nasty remarks rife with profanity. It also examines comments for attributes of deliberation, which are discussions across difference supported by evidence and rational arguments. Using an experiment, the book shows that uncivil comments jumpstart a chain reaction, leading first to negative emotion and then to greater intention to get politically involved. Overall, Online Incivility and Public Debate: Nasty Talk argues that while incivility mars online debate, it may also spark interest in important topics and allow for positive "deliberative moments" of quality discussion.
